Meanwhile, the debate over health care reform is raging on in the U.S. Senate. It takes 51 votes to pass a bill, but it takes 60 to stop debate on the bill and to move it to a vote. And as Jim Acosta explains, with disagreement on some of the different options in the bill, it’s something that may be tough to mbt shoes . Just days after Democrats thought they were closing in on a compromise to pass health care reform in the Sen- ate, the party’s delicate coalition of 60 votes started cracking once again. Back to the drawing board after a group of ten liberal and conservative Democrats agreed to strip the public option out of the Senate bill and add a provision allowing 55 to 64-year-old Americans to buy into the Medi- care program for seniors. But before the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office could weigh in on the cost of the so-called Medicare buy-in, the grum- bling had mbt . I think this Medicare buy- in is frankly another way to try to get to a single-payer, government- controlled health care system. And I and Senator Nelson think that would be bad for our country and for the people of our discount ghd straighteners. Even party loyalists are skeptical. A letter signed by some of the most liberal senators in Washington, including names like Leahy and Feingold, object to the Medicare buy-in because of the program’s lower reimbursement rates for doctors. Add to that Republican complaints that Medicare is going usb flash. Medicare, of course, is already unsustainable. It’s going broke in seven years. And the bill itself, the core bill, purports to cut Medicare by half a trillion dollars. Then, if you expand Medicare and put more