椿桦:遭遇性侵的女子 该递套还是亮刀?
来源:大洋网-信息时报 2011年05月13日01:43
◎椿桦 时事评论员
防范性侵以及由此带来的伤害,是女同胞的一大旷世难题。最近,华中师大性学副教授彭晓辉似乎在这方面取得了研究成果,他日前在南京师大的一次性学讲座中,语惊四座地提出:“遭遇性侵犯女性应主动递上避孕套”,因为“及时递上避孕套,那是保护女性免受艾滋病等性传播疾病的最后一道屏障。”
语不惊人死不休是当代专家的一个共同特点。但很多时候,这种所谓的前卫观点未必是苦心研究出来的,而很可能是胆子大脸皮厚的结果。我不敢说彭专家的高论属于后者,但可以肯定的是,所谓“遭性侵女性应主动递套”并不是个新鲜的话题,同时这个观点与性学研究关系不大,而同社会治安与卫生防疫的讨论则更接近。
面对质疑,彭专家如此答到:“那么你认为女性在面对歹徒的时候应该以死相拼,做贞洁烈女了?”这个说法颇为咄咄逼人,他等于是给你出了道棘手的选择题:对于强奸犯,是乖乖就范好,还是以死相拼好?这么看来我们要是不支持彭专家的观点,就要背负“草菅人命”的道德责难了!这种似是而非的话语陷阱,还真唬住了一些人,在质疑的声音中的确也有稀稀拉拉的赞同声。这说明,生命与身体健康优先于人格尊严的功利主义思维,还是有一定市场的。
难道我们没有第三种选择么?面对性侵犯,除了套子,是否可以亮出刀子?
我们要晓得,面对性侵,反抗和还击是被侵害人的本能,她们很难做到主动配合。真要是主动递套配合的话,那么这对强奸与通奸的界定就困难了。而且你也很难想象,女人真要是像彭专家所建议的那样,随身带套出门,会是多么荒诞无稽的事儿——带着安全套,随时应付可能发生的性侵?她的男友或丈夫发现其包里始终有个套,会怎么理解?如果包里的套子哪天不见了,又会遭到什么样的对待?
我们当然承认生命与身体健康的重要性。但无论在哪个国家,因为遭遇性侵而选择自杀的女性是为数不少的,这说明即使顺从性侵,也不能确定可以保命,毕竟将人格尊严看得比生命还要重的贞烈之人不在少数。而且更关键的是,反抗并不必然意味着生命危险,如果女性随身带的是刀子,很大程度上会影响歹徒的侵害行为与想法。这是一种威慑,也是法律赋予的正当防卫权利,正因为有反抗和威慑,才使得当下社会的强奸现象是小概率事件。假如依照彭专家的建议,反抗变成顺从,那么可以想见将来的色狼们会是多么地活跃与胆大妄为。
我知道前些年,美国纽约有个相关调查,超过90%的美国男人赞成妻子面对强奸时以保命为先,顺从性侵。但这个调查同样假定了反抗就可能丢命的伪命题,除了说明男人对妻子生命的特殊关爱,并不能证明递安全套配合强奸的正确性。显然,对付强暴,提高女性的反抗能力要比妥协顺从靠谱得多。








艾滋病不治会早死,早治才康复 艾滋病不治会早死,早治才康复 艾滋病不治会早死,早治才康复 艾滋病不治会早死,早治才康复
|
图示∶2010年12月即将出版的《中国特色医疗金鉴》登载的刘君主任及其机构 |
|
|

Chun-Hua: women suffered sexual abuse or the light of the delivery set of knives?
Source: Dayang - Information Times at 1:43 on May 13, 2011
Chun-Hua commentators ◎
Prevent sexual assault and the resulting damage is a major Masterpieces female compatriots problem. Recently, the Central China Normal University, Associate Professor Peng Xiaohui sexuality seems to have made in this research, he has one in Nanjing Normal University, Chair, the extraordinary remarks to make: "female sexual experience should take the initiative handed condoms," because "promptly handed him a condom, that is to protect women from sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS, the last barrier."
Words do not startle is a common feature of contemporary experts. But very often, so-called avant-garde ideas may not be out of painstaking research, which is likely to be the result of courageous thick-skinned. I can not say the high-Peng expert on the latter, but it is certain that the so-called "women have been raped should take the initiative to set delivery" is not a new topic, but this view has little to do with sex research, while the same social security and health and epidemic prevention is even close to the discussions.
Face of challenge, Peng experts that say: "So you think women should be in the face of criminals to death when the juxtaposition, to do a chaste woman martyr?" This argument is quite aggressive, he waited so difficult to get out of the multiple-choice Road : For the rapist is nice to give in good or better to die juxtaposition? If we do not support such a view point experts Peng, must bear the "disregard for human life" the moral blame it! This paradoxical discourse trap, really scare some people, the question is indeed the voice of the endorsement is also sparse sound. This shows that the health priorities in life and dignity of utilitarianism, or can have a certain market.
Do not we have a third choice? The face of sexual abuse, in addition to cap, can flashed a knife?
We want to know the face of sexual assault, resist and fight back is against human instinct, they are difficult to achieve active cooperation. True if the active set with the delivery, then this definition of rape and adultery to difficult. And you can hardly imagine a woman as true if, as suggested by experts Peng, carry with them sets out, is how preposterous thing - with a condom, sexual assault may occur at any time to meet? Her boyfriend or husband has always been found to have a set of bag will be how to understand? Day if the bag cover was gone, what would have been treated?
We certainly recognize the importance of life and physical health. But no matter in which country, as experienced sexual abuse, committed suicide is a significant number of women, which suggests that, even submissive sexual assault, are not sure you can save your life, after all, more important than the dignity of life but also the person is not heavy Zhenlie minority. But, more crucially, resistance does not necessarily mean life is in danger, if women carry a knife to a large extent will affect the behavior of thugs against the idea. This is a deterrent, but also the right of self-defense under the law, because there is resistance and deterrence that makes the phenomenon of contemporary society, rape is a small probability event. If the advice of experts in accordance with Peng, resistance into compliance, then one can imagine the future will be how they pervert active and audacious.
I know a few years ago, New York has a related investigation, over 90% of American men face rape in favor of his wife for the first time to save your life, obedience sexual assault. But the survey also assumes that Claudius had commanded against the pseudo-proposition may, in addition to that special man to his wife of life care, and delivery can not prove the correctness of condom with the rape. Clearly, to deal with violence, enhancing women's capacity for resistance is much more than the compromise compliance Kaopu.
|